{"id":1529,"date":"2019-03-05T15:44:46","date_gmt":"2019-03-05T15:44:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.manchester.ac.uk\/sci\/?p=1529"},"modified":"2022-05-20T11:42:44","modified_gmt":"2022-05-20T10:42:44","slug":"everyday-thriftiness-austerity-and-sustainability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.manchester.ac.uk\/sci\/2019\/03\/05\/everyday-thriftiness-austerity-and-sustainability\/","title":{"rendered":"Everyday thriftiness: Austerity and sustainability"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ _builder_version=”3.0.106″ menu_id=”7″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” background_layout=”dark” module_class=”main-navigation” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.0.106″ title=”on” meta=”on” author=”on” date=”on” categories=”on” comments=”on” featured_image=”on” featured_placement=”above” text_color=”dark” text_background=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

With 12.4 million people living in absolute low income poverty in the UK in 2016\/17, continued uncertainty from Brexit, and persistent issues with the new benefits system, Universal Credit, life remains bleak for many in the UK. As austerity measures carry on wreaking havoc, particularly amongst the most vulnerable in society, the government continues to push the responsibility of provision on to community and third sector organisations.<\/p>\n

In 2016 the Cabinet Office issued guidance on fostering and creating \u2018community resilience<\/a>\u2019, whereby \u2018communities, businesses, and individuals are empowered to harness local resources and expertise to help themselves and their communities\u2019.\u00a0 This was followed in 2018 by a lengthy document issued by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government on creating \u2018Integrated Communities<\/a>\u2019, drawing on multiple third sector and grassroots endeavours as case studies of community cohesion.\u00a0 Coupled with terms such as \u2018asset based\u2019 approaches and \u2018social prescribing\u2019 becoming commonplace in national and local government rhetoric, the message continues that the onus for future provision resides not with the welfare state but with the goodwill (and continuation) of voluntary organisations and their supporters.\u00a0 Take a recent case in Blackburn, of a locally well-known homeless man found dead outside a branch of Boots after a particularly cold night.\u00a0 The council response was to direct any rough sleepers to The Salvation Army who can offer overnight accommodation.\u00a0 The council work in partnership with the charity \u2013seemingly no longer having the resources to deal with such issues, therefore they outsource and signpost to local, often voluntary, groups.\u00a0 This model is prolific across UK local government.<\/p>\n

My work examines thrift and diverse and alternative economies of provisioning.\u00a0 I am interested in how third sector, voluntary organisations such as pay-as-you feel cafes like\u00a0Real Junk Food Project<\/a>, or furniture re-use networks like the charity\u00a0Rebuild<\/a>\u00a0not only help to tackle issues of financial hardship but also challenges of sustainable resource use.\u00a0 In particular, I am interested in \u2018ordinary provision\u2019 so provisioning activities which are not classed as \u2018emergency\u2019 with a specific temporality of speed and haste, such as food banks or homeless shelters, but those which are everyday and more mundane.\u00a0\u00a0 I believe that it is these often overlooked forms of provision which are central to people\u2019s everyday opportunities of \u2018getting on and getting by\u2019 in everyday life and which could form the foundations of the \u2018community resilience\u2019 the government so desperately desires.<\/p>\n

Yet a key part of my argument is that the activities of these organisations are not new.\u00a0 They most certainly involve new spaces, new structures and new formats but the activities and materials remain the same.\u00a0\u00a0As I have illustrated<\/a>\u00a0practices such as lending, sharing, repairing, making and mending are part of\u00a0age old everyday activities<\/a>\u00a0of the political economy of the household and its networks, as brought to life by Ray Pahl (1984) in his seminal work\u00a0The Divisions of Labour<\/em>.\u00a0 Such practices can be interpreted as everyday forms of thrift.\u00a0 Whilst thrift is often read through a financial lens and the notion of saving to spend, unpicking thrift reveals a myriad of activities and practices which take place beyond the point of purchase and removed from monetary matters.<\/p>\n

As I illustrate in\u00a0my article exploring contemporary thrift<\/a>\u00a0in\u00a0The Sociological Review<\/em>, within the household, thrift is orientated around a constellation of motivations, these are financial necessity, conscience and enjoyment.\u00a0 As resources move through the home, these motivations play out in different ways overlapping, competing and interweaving with one another through varying thrift activities and the values attached to them.\u00a0 Examples include darning gloves, not just for financial reasons but also enjoyment at engaging in the practice, or using leftover food to save money but also being conscious of the environmental impact of wasting it.\u00a0 Thrift therefore becomes not just an act of consumption but also one of production as objects are altered and changed as they journey into, through and out of the home.\u00a0 Similar thrifty motivations and valuation practices can be identified in the activities of third sector provisioning organisations.\u00a0 For example volunteers and service users of a food group I attended would regularly share home-made produce, often made from food received at the group, so that it is not wasted but also because of the enjoyment of gifting something homemade to others.<\/p>\n

The important point being that in the context of austerity thrift activities are bought to the fore.\u00a0 They are a means of saving precious resources and survival.\u00a0 Households and community organisations draw upon practices of lending, sharing, mending and making to ensure that people can eat, and do have access to essential items such as clothing and furniture.\u00a0 Yet the practices undertaken are not new activities, and this is not a resurgence in a romanticised notion of make do and mend.\u00a0 Often these are everyday practices which have always been done but are now illuminated because of their deemed necessity in light of austerity.\u00a0 Yet to view them only through a financial lens overlooks their multiplicity and importance in debates on austerity.\u00a0 Such activities offer opportunities for enjoyment and socialising, a key nub in creating \u2018community resilience\u2019 and cohesion.\u00a0 However, they are also significant for issues of sustainable resource use.\u00a0 Circulating, sharing, re-using, repairing of resources all reduce waste and the requirement to produce more resources.<\/p>\n

Thus whilst the government pushes for community resilience and looks to third sector organisations to provision essential resources, they are overlooking a key component \u2013 thrifty everyday activities undertaken by communal organisations and households do offer a means to create community cohesion, but they also offer opportunities for much more sustainable forms of resource use.\u00a0 Maybe future work could think carefully about the links between austerity and sustainability?<\/p>\n

This blog originally appeared on <\/em>The Sociological Review blog<\/em><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Helen Holmes<\/a> is a Research Fellow at the Sustainable Consumption Institute.\u00a0 Her paper on \u201cUnpicking contemporary thrift: Getting on and getting by in everyday life\u201d<\/a> was published recently by The Sociological Review.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” button_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_size__hover=”null” button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_size__hover=”null” button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_size__hover=”null” button_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_color__hover=”null” button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_color__hover=”null” button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_color__hover=”null” button_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_width__hover=”null” button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_width__hover=”null” button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_width__hover=”null” button_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_color__hover=”null” button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_color__hover=”null” button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_color__hover=”null” button_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_radius__hover=”null” button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_radius__hover=”null” button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_radius__hover=”null” button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_bg_color__hover=”null” button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_bg_color__hover=”null” button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_bg_color__hover=”null” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Related<\/h1>\n

Related posts:<\/h3>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>

Who holds the power? The state, corporations, and the regulatory turn in governance<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

The International Sustainability Transitions Conference 2017<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Anti-Net Zero Populism and the future of British climate policy<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Contact Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 306 6000<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Find Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

The University of Manchester
Oxford Rd
Manchester
M13 9PL
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n