{"id":2098,"date":"2024-09-20T11:14:04","date_gmt":"2024-09-20T10:14:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.manchester.ac.uk\/sci\/?p=2098"},"modified":"2024-11-06T19:59:24","modified_gmt":"2024-11-06T19:59:24","slug":"foraging-for-sustainability-amongst-capitalist-ruins","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.manchester.ac.uk\/sci\/2024\/09\/20\/foraging-for-sustainability-amongst-capitalist-ruins\/","title":{"rendered":"Foraging for sustainability amongst capitalist ruins"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” _builder_version=”3.17.6″ next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ menu_id=”7″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” module_class=”main-navigation” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”dark” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.0.106″ title=”on” meta=”on” author=”on” date=”on” categories=”on” comments=”on” featured_image=”on” featured_placement=”above” text_color=”dark” text_background=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Image credit: Mark Shtanov<\/em><\/p>\n

Caroline Cornier, Tetyana Solovey, Tim Siew and Mark Shtanov on sustainability through interdisciplinary lenses<\/h5>\n

This blog is the result of an interdisciplinary group of PhD researchers who came together over the summer to read and discuss Anna Tsing\u2019s The Mushroom at the End of the World \u2013 On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins<\/em> (2015). While the book doesn’t solely focus on sustainability, its exploration of human-disturbed forests and the commodity chains of matsutake mushrooms sparked ideas related to sustainability. Coming from diverse disciplines \u2014 architecture, political economy, political theory, and sociology \u2014 we found new ways to engage with and discuss sustainability from different perspectives.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/h5>\n
Caroline Cornier, PhD researcher at the Global Development Institute<\/h5>\n

As a doctoral researcher investigating the postcolonial political economy of cocoa, what struck me is Tsing\u2019s actor-focused, patchy yet all-encompassing look at a particular value chain:<\/span> the journey of the matsutake mushroom from the hands of precarious pickers to affluent\u00a0 eaters and back. Constructing her narrative out of detailed, site-specific stories around mushrooms without ever hiding the subjective nature of her assemblage, the author shows her argument through the structure: the world is built on uncountable connections and the more connections we notice the more sustainable our individual sensemaking can be.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

By defending the inherent value of the \u2018<\/span>art of noticing<\/span><\/i>\u2019 for research, Tsing effectively extends qualitative, inductive methods and site-specific sustainability visions to the study of homogenizing global supply chain based capitalism. In a world obsessed with measurability and economies of scale, she rehabilitates attention to \u2018humble details\u2019 and \u2018indeterminate encounters\u2019 to explain convergence within difference and survival despite precarity. Hence, the author effectively rejects visions of capitalism as a necessarily uniforming bulldozer. Instead, Tsing shows that supply chain capitalism actually relies on uncontrolled production and individual actors’ translation efforts to amass capital and ultimately create value. She claims that it is only in this second stage that capitalist alienation and related unsustainable practices occur, while in the first stage individual actors have the freedom to proactively use their unregulated production practices to build precarity reducing (inter-species) relationships and common agendas. <\/span>
<\/span>
<\/span>For a Political Economist, often accused of cultivating determinsim, these new ways of making room for specificity and agency <\/span>within <\/span><\/i>the study of capitalism are utterly exciting. The challenge will be, however, to stay away from romanticising these rediscovered realities while figuring out how to sustainabily coexist in the long run. <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/h5>\n
Tetyana Solovey, PhD researcher in Sociology<\/h5>\n

I research material culture, sustainability, and affect theory, with a background in media and communications. What particularly resonates with me is the discussion of sustainability<\/strong> and nostalgia<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

The book illustrates this through the story of the “satoyama woodlands,” where the culturally significant matsutake mushroom grows in Japan. The story begins with Professor K, who initially studied economics to alleviate poverty but shifted his focus to restoring peasant forests in Japan. This is how he came to the conclusion that sustainability is shaped by nostalgia. Starting with this promise of nostalgic romanticisation of pre-modern nature, Tsing eventually critiques, even caricatures the idealisation of pristine nature and the simplification of human-nature relationships.<\/p>\n

The satoyama woodlands illustrate the dynamic interplay between human activity and nature. Here, rice cultivation contributes to a diverse ecosystem, showing that human disruption can enhance resilience rather than degrade nature. The matsutake mushroom thrives in these disrupted environments. Even more, by comparing matsutake forests in the U.S., China, and Finland, the book reveals how perceptions of cultivated vs. “pristine” landscapes vary in different continents, eras and cultures. What may seem messy is actually alive and dynamic. It challenges the simplification of human-nature relationships, neither romanticising pre-modern nature nor condemning industrial approaches that treat forests as mere commodities.<\/p>\n

So-called material turn in humanity studies acknowledges the equal roles of human and non-human participants in shaping social life. Conveying this complexity requires a specific language and approach. Tsing\u2019s book exemplifies this by treating non-human participants\u2014like mushrooms\u2014as integral to the research. Through their materiality and interconnectedness with ecosystems and human activity, she presents the mushroom forest from multiple perspectives: nematode worms, pines, intermediaries, pickers, scientists, etc. This polyphonic storytelling, rather than a purely anthropological account, aligns with methodological attempts that avoid prioritising humans in research and writing.<\/p>\n

Sustainability is often presented in problematic ways. While romanticising the pre-industrial past may entice people into eco-consciousness without moral pressure, it can also be misleading. A more nuanced narrative, informed by material culture studies, allows us to understand sustainability as a complex web of material relationships between human and non-human actors and an ongoing, collaborative process.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/h5>\n
Tim Siew, PhD researcher in Political Theory<\/h5>\n

I research democratic theory, focusing on how democracy might work despite stubborn disagreement. Two themes were particularly interesting: (i) her conception of Assemblages<\/strong>, and (ii) hyper-acceptance of Precarity<\/strong>. Tsing conceives of Assemblages as unfixed, unbounded sites of Contamination (where different species and lifeways influence each other by adapting and collaborating) where a diversity of entangled agents \u201ccoalesce, change, and dissolve\u201d in patches of \u201clayered, inconsistent, and jumbled\u201d worldviews in response to conditions. She advocates for this in a total acceptance of Precarity (our dependence on, and vulnerability to, each other) due to its inevitability, viewing Modernity\u2019s attempts at overcoming Precarity through centralising survival efforts as misguided.<\/p>\n

Broadly speaking, I agree with Tsing\u2019s characterisation of Assemblages as a non-uniform, decentralised site of interdependency. Such an arrangement would give its members greater agency in determining their outcomes. However, people (and various other organisms) differ in their needs and wants, and interpret the world differently. Conflicting needs and wants are inevitable, and no perfect solution will arise. For this reason, I find Tsing over-privileges Precarity, since people can conceive of their interests at the expense of others. Our vulnerability to, and dependency on, others cannot justify a society built on assuming the \u2018kindness of strangers\u2019. Some<\/em> centralised protection against the worst ravages of Precarity can be justified, and figuring out what this might be is politics. As a democratic theorist, I\u2019m interested in how, and to what degree, we should seek to mitigate Precarity, considering the diversity (in attitudes and demands) of citizens. Factoring in the environmental requirement of sustainability complicates this further \u2013 how should Precarity be mitigated, considering that a trade-off between mitigating Precarity and sustainability might exist?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Mark Shtanov, PhD researcher in Architecture<\/h5>\n

I research the ritualistic practices of anatomical specimens at industrial waste incinerators. Tsing\u2019s idea of freedom directly relates to social sustainability, an increasingly prominent aspect of sustainability strategies across businesses and institutions, notably influencing the United Nations\u2019 development goals. A social sustainability perspective incorporates matters of justice, peace and wellbeing into the wider debates around the environmental challenges. Rather than being an isolated anthropocentric concern, societal well-being is an integral component of sustainable more-than-human ecologies. The book touches on the conditions fostering mental wellbeing in the context of natural settings, deteriorated by capitalist production.<\/p>\n

In the early chapters, Tsing introduces the concept of freedom<\/strong>, as a \u2018shared concern that yet takes on many meanings and leads in varied directions\u2019 (p. 94). Oregon forests offer war veterans and refugees a liberating therapy of safely and meaningfully enacting their trauma and healing their memories. Unable to meaningfully pursue urban capitalist lifestyles, the troubled members of the human community find mental and economic freedom in interacting with the more-than-human habitats at the pericapitalist<\/strong> fringes. Society\u2019s outcasts interact with forests that are in themselves troubled through loggers\u2019 or activists\u2019 efforts: these cause for only particular tree and plant species to thrive. This resulting habitat makes possible the emergence of matsutake that are subsequently foraged by the veterans and refugees. Through symbiotic inter-species transactions, a disturbed forest sustains disturbed minds. As the book progresses beyond this Oregon example, we encounter further freedom-seeking exiles across the different corners of the world.<\/p>\n

Under the guise of freedom, Tsing presents conditions for achieving peace with oneself and with others. Emerging as part of networked inter-species assemblages<\/strong> outside of institutional planning and regulatory control, these conditions are unlikely to lend themselves to replication or scaling up. On this basis, it is challenging to directly translate Tsing\u2019s observations into policies and approaches for social sustainability. Nevertheless, the book offers a hopeful insight of how therapeutic environments can spring up as a result of unruly forces – like mushrooms.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

An undercurrent in Tsing\u2019s work is her rejection of homogeneity and standardisation, especially regarding systems with complex dynamics between organisms. Doing so, one can find different perspectives to view reality. Latching onto this theme, the four of us have unveiled four different perspectives on sustainability in our own ways. Through the methodology of Noticing, one might discover heterogeneity, debunking the myth of standardisation. By examining the interplay between human and nature co-adapting around each other, one can uncover the complex network of material relationships between human and non-human actors. The \u201clayered, inconsistent, and jumbled\u201d worldviews in assemblages highlight our mutual dependency and vulnerability. Meanwhile, the prism of freedom helps in appreciating the pericapitalist fringes with uncontrollable dimensions of social sustainability for people living in more-than-human habitats. To look at anything from one perspective misses the point. Those striving towards sustainability should reject a \u2018unified inventory\u2019 of solutions, recognise the multiplicity of interrelated contexts, and address them where they stand. This approach could lead to sustainable paths within postcapitalist ruins.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t
\n\t\t\tTetyana Solovey, a cultural sociologist, researching\/working across the fields of material culture, sustainability and consumption, qualitative research, and affect theory.\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t
\n\t\t\tMark Shtanov, an architect and a researcher working at the intersection of waste studies and death studies using graphic ethnography.\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t
\n\t\t\tTimothy Siew, a political theorist researching on the potential for a just, egalitarian democracy that a pluralist polity finds legitimate.\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t
\n\t\t\tCaroline Cornier, a political economist researching the drivers of commodity dependence using the case of cocoa in C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire.\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” button_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_size__hover=”null” button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_size__hover=”null” button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_size__hover=”null” button_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_color__hover=”null” button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_color__hover=”null” button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_color__hover=”null” button_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_width__hover=”null” button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_width__hover=”null” button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_width__hover=”null” button_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_color__hover=”null” button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_color__hover=”null” button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_color__hover=”null” button_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_radius__hover=”null” button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_radius__hover=”null” button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_radius__hover=”null” button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_bg_color__hover=”null” button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_bg_color__hover=”null” button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_bg_color__hover=”null” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Related<\/h1>\n

Related posts:<\/h3>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>

Joined\u2011Up Sustainability Transformations: Insights from the JUST Centre\u2019s regional review<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Resilient or environmentally friendly? Both are possible when seafood businesses prepare for long-te...<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

The Politics of Sustainable\u00a0Investment: Challenges and Possible Research Directions\u00a0<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Contact Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 275 0189<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Find Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

The Sustainable Consumption Institute
9th Floor
Alliance Manchester Business School
Booth Street West
Manchester M15 6PB
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n