{"id":2439,"date":"2026-06-12T14:58:42","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T13:58:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.manchester.ac.uk\/sci\/?p=2439"},"modified":"2026-07-10T13:15:06","modified_gmt":"2026-07-10T12:15:06","slug":"the-politics-of-sustainable-investment-challenges-and-possible-research-directions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.manchester.ac.uk\/sci\/2026\/06\/12\/the-politics-of-sustainable-investment-challenges-and-possible-research-directions\/","title":{"rendered":"The Politics of Sustainable\u00a0Investment: Challenges and Possible Research Directions\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” _builder_version=”3.17.6″ next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ menu_id=”7″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” module_class=”main-navigation” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”dark” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.0.106″ title=”on” meta=”on” author=”on” date=”on” categories=”on” comments=”on” featured_image=”on” featured_placement=”above” text_color=”dark” text_background=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

As political backlash against ESG intensifies across North America and Europe, sustainable finance has become a site of open controversy. An SCI\u2011supported workshop explored how researchers can respond to this increasingly contested terrain.\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Authors:\u00a0Jeremy Brice, Ben Eyre, Aarti Krishnan, Felicia Liu, Ian Robertson,\u00a0Ser-Huang Poon, Narek Mirzoyan, Caroline Schuster,\u00a0Catherine\u00a0Mazhandu,\u00a0Frances Brill,\u00a0Qiuyu\u00a0Jiang, Cancan Wang, Jens Christiansen, James Linsley-Parrish, Theo Stanley and Nicholas Jepson<\/i>\u00a0<\/h4>\n

\u00a0<\/h4>\n

Relationships between politics, finance and sustainability are shifting rapidly as financial institutions\u2019 engagements with environmental and social issues become the focus of controversy and contestation. Since the inauguration of the second Trump administration, politicians and government officials in the USA have denounced Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investment practices as contaminating financial markets with a radical or ideological \u2018woke\u2019 political agenda (Christiansen et al 2025<\/a>). These accusations (and accompanying threats of divestment or regulatory action) have spurred many North American financial institutions to eliminate sustainable investment products and practices, and may also be driving a reduction in ambition among some multi-stakeholder sustainable finance networks (Makortoff\u00a02025<\/a>;\u00a0Jessop and Kerber 2025<\/a>). Some asset owners (principally European pension funds) have responded by withdrawing capital from North American financial institutions to ensure that it is invested and managed in ways compatible with their\u00a0home\u00a0governments\u2019\u00a0regulatory requirements\u00a0and\u00a0their\u00a0domestic clients\u2019\u00a0political\u00a0values\u00a0(McDougall 2025<\/a>;\u00a0Raimonde 2025<\/a>).\u00a0By contrast, activists\u2019 demands for Norway\u2019s traditionally \u2018non-political\u2019 sovereign wealth fund to reinforce its human rights screening processes and divest from Israeli companies connected to the occupation of the Palestinian territories became a prominent focus of debate during the\u00a02025\u00a0Norwegian general election\u00a0campaign\u00a0(Bangstad\u00a02025<\/a>).\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

SCI members Jeremy Brice and Aarti Krishnan, working with SCI visiting researcher Ben Eyre, felt that the theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches that we had used in our previous research on the sustainable investment sector\u00a0(for instance\u00a0Brice et al 2022<\/a>;\u00a0Eyre et al 2024<\/a>)\u00a0struggled to accommodate and account for these developments.\u00a0The ongoing backlash against\u00a0sustainable investment\u00a0especially\u00a0calls into question\u00a0a tendency in much existing research to present\u00a0it\u00a0as a broadly \u2018antipolitical\u2019 endeavour which authorises financial markets and actors to govern environmental and social problems through moving sustainability issues from the domain of political contestation into that of financial calculation (Parfitt 2024<\/a>). In response to these\u00a0challenges\u00a0we organised a workshop at the Alliance Manchester Business School on \u2018The Politics of Materiality in Sustainable Investment\u2019 on the 16th<\/sup>\u00a0and\u00a017th<\/sup>\u00a0of September \u00a02025 , which was\u00a0supported by SCI\u00a0funding.\u00a0This event drew upon a discussion-based workshop framework developed by SCI colleagues to identify blind spots in existing scholarship and surface possible new research opportunities (which is discussed\u00a0in a previous post on this blog<\/a>) and attracted participants from as far afield as Australia, Canada,\u00a0Denmark and\u00a0Switzerland. The workshop aimed to explore the challenges faced by critical scholarship on sustainable investment in the current political moment and to identify alternative theoretical and methodological orientations which might produce knowledge that responds more effectively to them.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Current Research Challenges<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"On day\u00a01 of the workshop , \u00a0participants discussed what difficulties or complications the current political moment raises for critical social\u00a0science\u00a0researchers working on sustainable finance. During these conversations we identified three distinct\u00a0positional, methodological and theoretical<\/i>\u00a0challenges:\u00a0<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Positional challenges<\/b>: Increasingly overt political struggle over sustainable finance instruments and institutions undercuts familiar scholarly arguments that these arrangements serve to depoliticise sustainability and facilitate the surreptitious imposition of neoliberal governance agendas.\u00a0However,\u00a0it has also seen figures in the \u2018anti-woke\u2019 investing movement (and related political actors) justify their attacks on sustainable investment initiatives through claiming that sustainable finance actors are attempting to impose an ideological agenda on market actors through undemocratic means. This challenges critical scholars both to question whether their own analyses of sustainable investment\u2019s antipolitical tendencies are being repurposed to advance authoritarian and anti-environmental political agendas and to ask whether the increasingly contested status of sustainable finance initiatives makes it necessary to move beyond these familiar critiques. \u00a0<\/li>\n
  2. Methodological Challenges<\/b>: The explicitly political character of ongoing debates over sustainable finance also poses methodological challenges to scholarship exploring \u2018technopolitical\u2019 dimensions of financial practice. Such work typically examines struggles among sustainable finance actors over which datasets, standards and technical devices should be used to inform investment decisions and to evaluate their sustainability impacts. Often, it argues that these seemingly technical disputes advance specific visions of sustainability by granting their victors the authority required to impose definitions of sustainability which align with their interests and so to reconfigure the economic interests of others (Taeger et al 2025<\/a>). However, many of the sustainable finance sector\u2019s new political adversaries explicitly reject its conventions of epistemic credibility and instead problematise its influence and activities in cultural or ideological terms. Research methodologies orientated towards examining the production, circulation and performativity of knowledges produced within the sustainable finance field therefore arguably struggle to capture the stakes of some such political interventions or to account for their origins, internal logics and effects.\u00a0\u00a0<\/li>\n
  3. Theoretical Challenges<\/b>: This move beyond knowledge politics also unsettles much existing scholarship\u2019s tendency to treat sustainable finance as part of a technocratic regime of\u00a0neoliberal\u00a0governance which presumes that market actors\u2019 commercial expertise will equip them to find the most efficient solutions to social, economic and\u00a0environmental problems. This settlement until recently offered financial\u00a0actors\u00a0considerable authority to define sustainability issues and to judge the desirability of policymakers\u2019 attempts to address them \u2013 whether through developing purpose-built sustainable finance devices such as green bonds and debt for nature swaps or by adjusting the interest rates charged on government debt. However, increasingly explicit debate over the legitimacy of financial actors\u2019 involvement in shaping sustainability policy and attacks upon the epistemic conventions which justify it suggest that this settlement is under pressure and may be breaking down. This challenges researchers to theorise whether (and if so how) the sustainable finance sector might operate in an increasingly multipolar and post-neoliberal world.\u00a0<\/li>\n
  4. \u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Directions for future research<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Discussions during the second day of the workshop explored how\u00a0we as\u00a0social researchers working on sustainable finance might broaden\u00a0our\u00a0theoretical and methodological repertoire\u00a0in order to\u00a0respond more effectively to these challenges, and thus to produce scholarship which better addresses the current political moment.\u00a0Reflecting the varied disciplinary backgrounds, geographical contexts and empirical interests which inform our work, workshop participants\u00a0did not aim to come to a single unified position. Instead, we identified several ways in which we could complement\u00a0existing research approaches through attending to the following political sites, processes and phenomena:\u00a0<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Discursive change<\/b>: Social researchers might gain greater understanding of the processes which politicise specific sustainable finance initiatives and practices (and erode the legitimacy of some financial knowledges and devices) through attending to the redefinition and resignification of terms such as sustainability, gender and ESG. Exploring how opponents of sustainable finance attempt to endow such terminology with new and pejorative meanings might enable researchers to understand why some sustainable finance initiatives and practices become objects of political controversy while others attract little attention. It might also help to explain how the focus of such political disputes comes to be shifted away from contests over the technical content of financial data and devices and towards the terrain of cultural meanings and imaginaries. \u00a0<\/li>\n
    2. Coalition-building<\/b>: Researchers might also examine how opponents of sustainable finance (for instance political parties and think tanks) attempt to utilise these new meanings to\u00a0articulate\u00a0political concerns which others might share, to make common cause with potential allies, and to mobilise them to pursue shared objectives. This might aid researchers in explaining how movements opposed to sustainable finance emerge, cultivate support, and exert political influence. Scholars might also examine how actors concerned with promoting and protecting sustainable finance practices (such as NGOs and investor networks) attempt to survive and resist the current \u2018backlash\u2019 against sustainable investment. Through examining what enables\u00a0these\u00a0disparate actors to coalesce into political movements, researchers might gain new means of understanding how political campaigns against sustainable investment\u00a0initiatives are generated and of explaining why some sustainable investment coalitions endure in the face of political pressure while others diminish or retreat.\u00a0<\/li>\n
    3. Translation processes<\/b>: Finally, it will be important to build upon existing research programmes examining how the meaning of sustainable investment is enacted and negotiated through the organisational cultures, practices and infrastructures of financial institutions. Existing research often focuses on financial professionals\u2019 development of new sustainability knowledges, standards and devices and on their mobilisation to advance the interests or agendas of specific financial actors. However, it will be equally important for future scholarship to explore how financial institutions absorb the political pressures exerted by movements originating beyond the financial field.\u00a0Such research might examine how financial practitioners perceive these political pressures, respond to them, and translate them into change in the way that they organise their work, think about and portray their roles, and position themselves in the political arena (or resist doing so). It might thereby illuminate how political contestation over sustainable finance produces organisational, institutional and economic change (or\u00a0why it\u00a0proves unable to do so).\u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

       <\/p>\n

      Next steps<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>\n

      Since September workshop participants have continued\u00a0working together\u00a0to explore\u00a0and expand upon\u00a0these ideas\u00a0in several ways. Many of us are now actively engaged in a collaborative writing project examining\u00a0the challenges posed to sustainable finance research by the current political conjuncture and investigating possible responses to them, while other participants\u00a0are\u00a0developing\u00a0a paper exploring how climate\u00a0policy and reporting regimes shape the financial valuation of green technological innovation.\u00a0Meanwhile\u00a0several participants\u00a0presented\u00a0papers exploring the affective dimensions of sustainable finance contestations for a subsequent workshop on\u00a0Emotions and Affect in Sustainability Transitions<\/a>\u00a0which was organised\u00a0by SCI\u00a0colleagues Pawan Srikanth and Aarti Krishnan\u00a0in March 2026. We aim to consolidate this emerging\u00a0network of scholarship\u00a0through organising\u00a0a panel on \u201cThe politics of sustainable investment: challenges, limitations, and ways forward for critical scholarship\u201d at the SASE conference in Bordeaux in July 2026, which we hope\u00a0will form the foundation of a lively and enduring\u00a0research community.\u00a0<\/p>\n

      [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” button_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_size__hover=”null” button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_size__hover=”null” button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_size__hover=”null” button_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_color__hover=”null” button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_color__hover=”null” button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_color__hover=”null” button_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_width__hover=”null” button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_width__hover=”null” button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_width__hover=”null” button_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_color__hover=”null” button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_color__hover=”null” button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_color__hover=”null” button_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_radius__hover=”null” button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_radius__hover=”null” button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_radius__hover=”null” button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_bg_color__hover=”null” button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_bg_color__hover=”null” button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_bg_color__hover=”null” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

      Related<\/h1>\n

      Related posts:<\/h3>
      <\/div>
      <\/div>
      <\/div>

      From meat-free days to meat-free diets?<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
      <\/div>

      To tackle inequality, we must first understand the exploitation that creates it<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
      <\/div>

      The Green New Deal's contradiction<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
      <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

      [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

      Contact Us<\/h4>\n

      [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

      \u00a0<\/p>\n

      +44 (0) 161 275 0189<\/p>\n

      \u00a0<\/p>\n

      [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

      Find Us<\/h4>\n

      [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

      The Sustainable Consumption Institute
      9th Floor
      Alliance Manchester Business School
      Booth Street West
      Manchester M15 6PB
      UK<\/a><\/p>\n

      [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

      Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

      [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n