{"id":2493,"date":"2026-09-30T11:44:53","date_gmt":"2026-09-30T10:44:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.manchester.ac.uk\/sci\/?p=2493"},"modified":"2026-09-30T11:48:56","modified_gmt":"2026-09-30T10:48:56","slug":"longing-for-the-spirit-of-seattle-as-the-climate-and-global-politics-heat-up-a-curious-calm-reigns-at-the-wto-public-forum-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.manchester.ac.uk\/sci\/2026\/09\/30\/longing-for-the-spirit-of-seattle-as-the-climate-and-global-politics-heat-up-a-curious-calm-reigns-at-the-wto-public-forum-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Longing for the \u201cSpirit of Seattle\u201d: As the climate and global politics heat up, a curious calm reigns at the WTO Public Forum 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” fullwidth=”on” _builder_version=”3.17.6″ next_background_color=”#000000″ global_module=”322″][et_pb_fullwidth_menu global_parent=”322″ menu_id=”7″ submenu_direction=”downwards” fullwidth_menu=”off” module_class=”main-navigation” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”dark” \/][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” prev_background_color=”#000000″ next_background_color=”#1d1d1d”][et_pb_column type=”2_3″ specialty_columns=”2″][et_pb_row_inner locked=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”2_3″][et_pb_post_title _builder_version=”3.0.106″ title=”on” meta=”on” author=”on” date=”on” categories=”on” comments=”on” featured_image=”on” featured_placement=”above” text_color=”dark” text_background=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.17.6″ background_layout=”light” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Silke Trommer and Yeqi Jin from the Department of Politics discuss the WTO Public Forum 2026 and its alarming lack of engagement with issues of trade and social justice, and sustainable development.\u00a0<\/h3>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

The World Trade Organization (WTO) Public Forum celebrated its 25th<\/sup>\u202fanniversary this year, having been originally convened in 2001 as the\u202fSymposium on Issues Confronting the World Trading System<\/a>. During the infamous 1999 Battle of Seattle<\/a> and what came to be known as the \u201cWTO legitimacy crisis\u201d<\/a>, feminists came together with workers, environmentalists, developmentalists and other groups to challenge the institutional set up, political power and corporate-centric rationale of trade governance in the neoliberal era<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"\"Yet, at the WTO Public Forum 2026, only those around long enough to have experienced the WTO\u2019s politicised and conflictual past could have known about this critical history. While banners in the main lobby celebrated the 100th<\/sup>\u202fanniversary of Centre William Rappard<\/i> \u2013 the building that housed the International Labour Organization from 1926 to 1975 before becoming home to the WTO\u2019s predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, in 1977 \u2013 no commemorations marked the 25th<\/sup>anniversary of the Public Forum. This absence occurred despite the fact that the Forum, in the WTO\u2019s own words, remains one of its key public transparency mechanisms and an opportunity for all of its stakeholders to voice their views on\u202f\u201clatest developments in global trade\u201d and on \u201cways of enhancing the multilateral system\u201d<\/a>.\u202f\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yet the WTO Public Forum 2026 failed to serve the event\u2019s original purpose<\/a> of providing space for participation, contestation and deliberation. The 2026 Forum was a day shorter than in previous years, while session times had been cut from 60 to 75 minutes. This set up gave the WTO Director-General (DG) Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala the opportunity to state that 2026 was the biggest WTO Public Forum ever, while individual participants testified informally on WTO corridors that they felt the Forum had never been this placid, with few in-depth discussions or relevant questions on the session floors.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Topics that once animated WTO critics and that remain alive and pressing, such as trade and (global) social justice or trade and sustainable development, remained on the margins of the Public Forum agenda. (For example, see the word cloud generated from 2026 WTO Public Forum session titles in image below).\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Here, we look at gender and trade\/inclusive trade and trade and environment\/climate specifically.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Inclusion without redistribution\u00a0<\/h4>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

At this year\u2019s Public Forum, a trend from 2025 continued, whereby gender and trade debates \u2013 which had been front and centre of the Forum programme over the previous ten years<\/a> \u2013 only featured on 12 out of 114 session titles<\/a>. Instead, services and digital trade were central to discussions. These topics are, however, far from separate issues. The fact that the digital transformation of the global economy and society entails a profound restructuring of global economic relations, including gender relations<\/a>, was not lost on a small number of sessions, where panellists considered the ways in which trade regulators may empower women entrepreneurs and traders to share in the gains from digital trade and digital services trade in particular.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yet, the wider and well-detailed risks of the currently dominant digital economy model received scant attention. These risks include, among others, gender bias in algorithms<\/a>, gender-based and intersectional discrimination and violence online, exclusion of marginalised genders in digital governance and technology development, exploitation of feminised paid and unpaid labour<\/a>, and the digital economy\u2019s destructive relationship with nature<\/a>. As a participant on a session regarding the trade case for considering women<\/a> remarked, in the current digital trade model, we risk \u201cefficiency without redistribution\u201d.\u00a0\u00a0\"\"<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Such remarks on people\u2019s lived experiences outside of the strict confines of digital marketplaces were spectacularly rare at the Forum. Indeed, there was only one panel, co-organised by Friedrich Ebert Stiftung<\/i> and the main German development agency, Deutsche Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Internationale Zusammenarbeit<\/i> (GIZ), that asked wider questions of \u201cgender justice\u201d<\/a>. For the most part, sessions advocated plugging women or otherwise marginalised entrepreneurs into existing digital markets and digital economy models, despite risks of reproducing gendered and intersectional inequalities inherent in market-based and corporate centric gender mainstreaming approaches<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Sustainability\u202fwithout nature\u00a0<\/h4>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

In sharp contrast with previous years, the original environmental concerns of sustainable development \u2013 famously a stated goal of the WTO<\/a> \u2013 was also diluted at the Forum, ironically at the end of Europe\u2019s hottest summer on record. A panellist on a circular services and economy<\/a> session pointed out that sustainability was no longer as prominent on the agenda as it had been three years ago. Sustainability, green trade, and\/or climate action themes featured only in 9 out of 114 session titles. This paucity leaves a worrying governance gap, not least because the Director of the WTO\u2019s Trade and Environment Division warned on a service trade and climate action session<\/a> that trade was barely discussed within climate governance frameworks such as the UN\u2019s annual COPs.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The trade\/environment governance gap is exacerbated when considering that in Forum discussions, terms such as \u201csustainability\u201d, \u201cecosystem\u201d, and \u201cenvironment\u201d were often used in a business context. Speakers using these terms were not referring to ecological processes or nature, but were calling for stronger interconnections among business actors, the development of supporting secondary industries, and the coordination of industrial regulations. These concepts were thus increasingly devoid of their original environmental content<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

At the same time, digitalisation and AI-driven development received considerable attention and unquestioned optimism in their potential to support environmentally friendly trade sectors, including the circular economy and green services<\/a>. While much of the discussion focused on how AI and digital technologies could power a more sustainable future, the sustainability of the digital and AI transition itself was rarely questioned. Audience questions around the documented high energy consumption<\/a>, intensive extraction and use of raw material resources<\/a>, including water, and growing electronic waste<\/a> received speculative and at times puzzling answers from policy-makers. The latter included the suggestion, made on the trade case for considering women<\/a> session, that AI may help expand water access.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Longing for the Spirit of Seattle\u00a0<\/h4>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Overall, the WTO Public Forum showed a spirit that WTO negotiations have long been lacking, namely that of consensus. Unfortunately, this consensus was achieved by largely bracketing out or de-politicising some of the most pressing problems of our time.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"\"As one WTO official remarked: \u201cWe need the spirit of Seattle\u201d. Instead, blind faith in technological solutions to global crises was common among global policy elites convening at the WTO Public Forum. Yet, it is misplaced and in need of disruption. As DG Okonjo-Iweala passed on her message that the WTO needs stronger public engagement in a meeting with civil society representatives, one can only hope she agrees.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Authors:\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Silke Trommer, <\/b>University of Manchester and Women in Development Europe+:\u00a0 silke.trommer@manchester.ac.uk\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yeqi Jin: <\/b>University of Manchester: yeqi.jin@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk\u00a0<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_post_nav _builder_version=”3.0.106″ in_same_term=”off” show_prev=”on” show_next=”on” prev_text=”Previous” next_text=”Next” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” \/][et_pb_comments _builder_version=”3.0.106″ show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” header_font_size_tablet=”51″ header_line_height_tablet=”2″ custom_button=”on” button_icon_placement=”right” button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_use_icon=”off” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off” button_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_size__hover=”null” button_one_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_size__hover=”null” button_two_text_size__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_size__hover=”null” button_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_text_color__hover=”null” button_one_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_text_color__hover=”null” button_two_text_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_text_color__hover=”null” button_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_width__hover=”null” button_one_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_width__hover=”null” button_two_border_width__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_width__hover=”null” button_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_color__hover=”null” button_one_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_color__hover=”null” button_two_border_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_color__hover=”null” button_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_border_radius__hover=”null” button_one_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_border_radius__hover=”null” button_two_border_radius__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_border_radius__hover=”null” button_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_one_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_two_letter_spacing__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_letter_spacing__hover=”null” button_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_bg_color__hover=”null” button_one_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_one_bg_color__hover=”null” button_two_bg_color__hover_enabled=”off” button_two_bg_color__hover=”null” \/][et_pb_text admin_label=”Related posts” _builder_version=”3.0.106″ background_layout=”light” locked=”on” parent_locked=”off”]<\/p>\n

Related<\/h1>\n

Related posts:<\/h3>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>

Rethinking Care: Sociological Perspectives from the Classroom<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

\u201cWe want to build capacity for citizens to research and propose what works best for them and to advo...<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a>
<\/div>

Who holds the power? The state, corporations, and the regulatory turn in governance<\/h2><\/div><\/div><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column_inner][\/et_pb_row_inner][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”3.0.106″ area=”sidebar-1″ orientation=”left” show_border=”off” background_layout=”light” locked=”on” \/][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Connect Title” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” _builder_version=”3.0.90″ background_color=”#1d1d1d” module_class=”footer-section” prev_background_color=”#ffffff” global_module=”380″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” global_parent=”380″ locked=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” use_custom_gutter=”off” make_equal=”off” module_id=”footer-row” _builder_version=”3.0.89″][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Contact Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Contact Us” global_parent=”380″ text_text_color=”#aaaaaa” parent_locked=”off” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” module_class=”contact-us” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

+44 (0) 161 275 0189<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Find Us Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Find Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Address” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” module_id=”address” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n

The Sustainable Consumption Institute
9th Floor
Alliance Manchester Business School
Booth Street West
Manchester M15 6PB
UK<\/a><\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Connect Title” global_parent=”380″ background_layout=”dark” text_text_color=”#ffffff” parent_locked=”off” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial”]<\/p>\n

Connect With Us<\/h4>\n

[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Social Media” global_parent=”380″ parent_locked=”off” _builder_version=”3.17.6″]<\/p>\n