Alicia Smith, an upcoming third-year law student, is passionate about initiating discussions on topics often considered taboo. She believes that addressing these subjects is crucial for societal progress and is dedicated to fostering environments where such discussions can occur openly and constructively. Alicia recently sat on the Institute of Teaching and Learning conference on the ‘Sustainability and a Socially Responsible Curriculum’ panel.

At first glance, a university campus appears to be a level playing field. Students from all backgrounds share the same dining halls, take part in the same societies, and attend the same classes. However, underneath the surface equality are more profound disparities. Universities may bring students from different socioeconomic backgrounds together, but it would be foolish to think that this proximity creates real empathy or understanding between the wealthier students and their less fortunate peers.

Students from affluent households frequently arrive at university with significant advantages. They often have had access to superior education, private tutoring, and a variety of extracurricular activities that strengthen their university applications. Financial stability enables them to concentrate on their academics without the extra stress of part-time employment. Furthermore, they are more likely to receive financial assistance from their families, allowing them to fully participate in the social parts of university life without financial constraints.

In contrast, students from poorer socioeconomic backgrounds  encounter a slew of difficulties. Many people combine their education with part-time work to sustain themselves, sacrificing crucial study time and social opportunities.  The financial load of tuition, housing, and living expenditures weighs hard on them, causing greater stress and anxiety.  While scholarships and bursaries can help, they rarely cover all of the expenses, leaving students to negotiate the intricate web of student loans and debt.

Apathy and Indifference

One of the most concerning features of this class disparity is the wealthier pupils’ seeming indifference to the plight of their less fortunate peers.  This lack of empathy is not necessarily born out of malice but often from ignorance and a lack of exposure to different existences. Many wealthier students view their less privileged peers’ challenges as outside their field of experience and hence do not register as significant concerns.

This indifference is palpable in various aspects of university life. For instance, social events and extracurricular activities often come with hidden costs that can be prohibitive for students from lower-income backgrounds. Societies may require membership fees, trips, or expensive equipment, effectively excluding those who cannot afford these extras. For the wealthier students, protected by their financial security, these barriers may not even register as obstacles, assuming everyone has the means to participate equally.

Moreover, the social circles formed at university often reflect pre-existing class divisions. Students from similar backgrounds often gravitate towards one another, creating a kind of bubble where the experiences and challenges of the “other side” remain unacknowledged. These social divides extend to housing choices as well, with more affluent students opting for pricier, more comfortable housing, while their less privileged peers settle for budget options, often in less desirable locations.

Service Learning as a Bridge

One possible strategy to bridge the class difference is to incorporate service learning into the university experience. Service learning integrates academic study and community service, allowing students to use their knowledge and abilities in real-world settings while addressing issues affecting society.  This pragmatic learning approach is especially effective at fostering empathy and understanding among students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

Through service learning, students are placed in diverse communities where they work alongside individuals from various walks of life. This direct engagement challenges students to confront their own assumptions and biases, encouraging them to develop a deeper appreciation for the complexities of social issues. For wealthier students, this experience can be eye-opening, exposing them to the realities faced by lower-income individuals and fostering a sense of social responsibility.

Furthermore, service-learning programmes frequently compel students to work with peers from other backgrounds, which encourages engagement and mutual understanding. Students can form meaningful relationships across social classes by working together towards a common objective. These experiences can also assist to empower the classroom by allowing each student to contribute their own unique thoughts and abilities to the project.

Conclusion

Finally, class divisions at UK universities show both the obstacles that students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds face and the promise for revolutionary change. Universities may help to bridge gaps and promote diversity by instilling empathy and compassion in all students. It is critical that universities take this opportunity to establish a more equal future in which every student, regardless of background, has the necessary support to succeed. Through conversations, action, and genuine empathy, we can break down barriers and create a community in which everyone can thrive.

Related